Dne 21.10.2015 v 17:52 Arvin Schnell napsal(a): >> As libstorage basically use CLI of other programs, so question >> is why not use more high level language. > > Why should C++11 not be a "very" (not in the term of > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_high-level_programming_language) > high level language? I fear an endless discussion coming.
Um, if I would start a complete new library I'd very likely use Ruby (unless another language would fit way better, I'd be willing to sacrifice some features to avoid learning yet another language...) But I do not want to start a flamewar, if libstorage developers are skilled in C++ and want to use it I'm fine with that. (It could be even worse, I know some worse languages than C++ ;-)) My concerns are mainly: - the code should be readable even for people who are not C++ experts or used C++ long time ago and forgot some C++ tricks - the code should be easily testable -- Ladislav Slezák Appliance department / YaST Developer Lihovarská 1060/12 190 00 Prague 9 / Czech Republic tel: +420 284 028 960 [email protected] SUSE -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
