The matter hereunder raised is welcomed and thanks for raising it.

I personally as a member of the ANCYL, YCLSA and staff member of what was
UYF before yesterday, have mixed impressions about the entire matter. First
and foremost, yesterday's event was an ANCYL rally and the launch of NYDA
and I am not sure as the YCLSA which happen to be an Ally of the same ANCYL,
what are saying about that? It does not require any political
education lecture or any workshop to make people aware that NYDA is not
supposed to be partisan since it is a State Agency. We need to accord our
own cadres who we entrust with responsibilities of power in government
agencies like this NYDA to lead without any interference. The Chairperson of
the NYDA spoke more as the Deputy President of the ANCYL I wonder what
does that say to us the young people of the Left? For Cde president of the
ANCYL to say that UYF and NYC were useless and they had inefficient staff in
a public platform is problematic. UYF and NYC remains the products of our
own ANC led governments. The reason for the merger of the two institutions
were never about what Julius said. They were mainly because they were
amongst other things; Youth Development was fragmented in the country
wherein you had the two institutions interfering into each other's mandates
and also that they had limitations in meeting the challenges of the youth of
the country because of the manner in which they were eatablished. For
instance you had the NYC with a mandate to deal with research, policy, lobby
and advocacy for mainstreaming the development of youth in departments and
all spheres of the state whereas the UYF had to implement youth development
programmes that will create jobs and bring in youth into the mainstream of
the economy by providing information, career advice and guidance, business
counslling, skills, linking youth enterprises to opportunities, business
vouchers and loans. Each of the latter programmes had their own challenges
and successes and it will be wise for any one of us to make an informed
analysis of those before concluding and declaring the entire institution as
useless. I for one have allieviated a suicidal young person while working as
an Manager of the Youth Advisory Centre that was in Bushbuckridge by
providing counselling that produced an Engineer in Forestry later. There are
so many youth I know who have accessed higher education due to the career
guidance that the UYF YACs were doing. I may not say much about business
funding but I know for a fact that there are so many youth who have
eastablished businesses due the UYF's contribution. What should be said very
clearly and of is splendidly correct is that the UYF and NYC had their own
weaknesses of which some of them included some appointment of wrong people
in certain senior positions. However that should not over-shadow the entire
organisational success!

What we need to do is to ensure that our own organisational structures are
strong from branches, districts to provinces. We need to have a commission
on youth development in branches that will monitor and support the Youth
Advisory Centres in our Local Municipalities and encourage our youth to stop
complaining and sit in their homes. NYDA will not be a success without a
Strong PYA which and in particular a strong YCLSA. YCLSA should take itself
serious and be listen into by the ANCYL and the big brother attitude towards
the allies of the PYA including ourselves as YCLSA will only stop the day
the YCLSA will have strong organised structures like in Limpopo and Northern
Cape provinces!

Aluta!

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:12 PM, frank talk <[email protected]> wrote:

>   Revolutionary greetings Cdes
>
>
>
> Indeed, the leaders of the League and the Republic, Malema and the Hon.
> Mzholozi, have spoken. However, without sounding too pessimistic, I am still
> not sure how are going to rid the new agency of the chronic inefficiencies
> that have characterized its predecessors such as the NYC and UYF.
>
>
>
> This is informed by the fact that it seems we still have the same
> individuals who were leading these dysfunctional organisations at the helm
> of this brainchild. Poor performance of the former agencies can't be
> divorced from their poor leadership. As much as we need experience but
> experience can't be overemphasized at the expense of efficiency and
> ultimately the success of the NYDA less we risk a one step forward two steps
> backward approach. We need accountable administrators who are well versed
> with youth issues, good governance and effective administrative functions.
> I’m of the view that the primary purpose for the creation of the NYDA was
> not to secure jobs for some pen-pushers but to render tangible service to
> the youth of this country with the formally marginalized youth being the
> first priority. Now the question is what we do before such sluggards find
> yet another comfort zone in this new agency that carries the hopes and
> aspirations of millions of poor young people out there in the bundus.
>
>
>
> The second issue is that of location. If we entertain hopes of having a
> youth agency that is directly responsive to the needs of millions of
> unemployed and poor young people in our country then I would like to believe
> that the NYDA should have one-stop (info & advice) centres spread out in a
> decentralized fashion right where the majority of these young people, i .e.
> townships and rural areas.
>
>
>
> However, in order for the new administration to achieve this it needs to
> send government officials to hold consultative indabas with young people so
> as to get their views as to what is it that they expect from this new
> agency; unlike in the past where the dominant practice was top-down
> management style.
>
>
>
> Lastly, if we say Socialism is the future then the thrust is on us to work
> for a successful NYDA by engaging government structures such as this NYDA
> and other departments to be responsive to issues affecting young people in
> their respective communities. As young Communists let’s wage the struggle at
> all angles with whatever weapon we have at our hands (guided by dialectical
> materialism of course); we need to be constructively vocal and participative
> so that we realize the state of Socialism.
>
>
>
> Yours in the Struggle,
>
> Talk Frank
>
>
>
> *Socialism is the Future; Build It Now!!!*
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to