Cde Mlatha is correct. We can't take anything away from the good
performance dished out by Bafana lastnyt. Compared to the kinda soccer
we used to display in the past couple of years, yesternight's
performance was beyond our expectations, particularly against a world's
renowned soccer kings such as Brazil.

I think we have progressed tactically and in terms of discipline. Let us
stop being permanent critics, but for once praise Bafana for the
magnificent display of soccer lastnyt. I do not necessarily apportion
any blame to the coach for keeping the team unchanged until the last
minutes. We would not have forgiven him if he had made any change just
before Brazil could score. I'm sure we were all gonna blame it on such a
substitution. I think all the players demonstrated committed and played
to the best of their ability lastnyt, including Mokoena himself, atleast
until he conceded that free-kick.

I think Mokoena committed an unnecessary foul in a dangerous area, and
of course he should have known better that you don't give away
free-kicks like those when you play against teams like Brazil.

The way we defended that free-kick also was not convincing. I could tell
even before the kick was taken that Alves was gonna explore the far
right where there were many Brazilian players. Khune also should have
known better which side to position himself as a goalkeeper in such
situations.

I was also not impressed with Teko Modise's performance. I think he
didn't give it his best, as compared to Pienaar, Tshabalala, Tshepo
Masilela, Siboniso, Booth, etc.

Nevertheless, Bafana just played beyond my expectations lastnyt. We are
indeed in the right direction towards 2010 preparations.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mxolisi Mlatha
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 12:40 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [YCLSA Discussion] Re: bafana ? We need a name change!


Comrade Mdu

I raised the issue of the name (Bafana) as a side issue and
it has no immediate tangible implications for the current
discussion. I do feel that it is a matter that we need to
pursue because relevance and meaning is important
especially if the name is used in the official marketing of
the game and team. Otherswise why not just call it SA Team,
which is what it is.

NOW! I am of the view that Santana has introduced tactical
astuteness that matches the Worlds best in the team. As
acknowledged by the Brazilian Team on Kickoff online after
last nights match. The team has boundless opportunity to
improve from where it is.

Cde Vilakazi we would all have chosen a different team of
22 players if we were asked to do so, even on the field of
play our starting 11 would be different. I was foreisntance
silently sceptical in the inclusion of Booth who has been
warming the bench at Sundowns how pleasantly did he
surprise me! Thus I dont want to make the issue a Mokoena
issue, because despite our improvements we still have
frailties in a number of departments. Someone may also
correctly point out that despite us having the best
defensive record in the Confed we are not scoring and that
is not a Mokoena issue. We must support the team that the
coach has chosen.

It seems like despite all the givens on the field of play
some of us deems it compulsory for the coach to substitute.
Yesterday we contained one of the best midfields in the
World, that has been ravaging other teams. We could have
brought in Mashego and Mphela (Who both are not known for
their defensive capabilities) in earlier by compromising
our midfields strenght and therefore our defense
capabilities. Thereby giving the field of play to the likes
of Kaka on a silver platter.It does also not help to have a
defensively poor team that scores two goals and allow in
five. Unfortunately these are the difficult choices that a
Coach has to make and I agree with the option exercised by
Santana.

The issue here is a scoring problem and it is not a Santana
issue. when last had we had a SA striker scoring 20 goals
both locally and abroad. I am of the view that with what he
has at his disposal the coach has done a marvellous job. We
should acknowledge a job well done and not exagerate our
prowse on the World football stage, you just have to look
at our soccer exports to understand what I mean. 

So in my view the coach has done well with what he has, we
can see structure, purpose, tactical awareness and a
fearless figthing spirit in Bafana.

Santana would know by now we are a hard to please nation.
But why should we have him if we will not allow him to do
his Job the best way he deems appropriate?

Mxolisi
---
Sent from UnionMail Service  [http://mail.union.org.za]


Disclaimer:<br><br>
This message may contain confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, 
distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail 
if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your 
system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secured or error-free as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or 
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability 
for any errors or omissions in the content of this message, which arise as a 
result of e-mail transmission. The Gauteng Provincial Government does not take 
responsibility for Gauteng Provincial Government users' personal views. Gauteng 
Provincial Government services available online at:<a 
href="http://www.gautengonline.gov.za/";>www.gautengonline.gov.za</a>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to