Cde Xoli,

In the Communist University we use the method of the late, well-known, South American Paulo Freire.

We dialogue. We dialogue with each other, and not with ghosts.

We like to look at situations remote in place and/or time, as a way to stimulate dialogue. In the end, the dialogue is always about ourselves and the problems that we face. Any text that we read is used as a "codification", or basis for a discussion.

Your riddle is not suitable to such a purpose. You give no facts but only conclusions. You conclude that there has been a change in class power relations in three countries. Which are they? What is the actual political economy of those countries? By political economy I mean the disposition and weight of the different class forces that exist in those countries, and to complete the picture, the trajectory of these classes?

Is the working class growing? Who is employing these workers? On what terms? Is the peasantry stable? How much of a petty-bourgeoisie is there? How big is the middle-class salaried bureaucracy? Which classes are growing, and which declining? Which, if any, of these classes is organised as a class, self-consciously? One could ask many more such questions.

What does a Bolivarian circle do? Does it do political education? What texts do they read?

If you are talking about Venezuela, and elections, don't forget the Caracazo, and the attempted coup that Chavez led in 1992 after which he spent two years in prison. If you are talking about Bolivia, please don't insult the people's struggle by saying it was just a matter of walking up to the ballot box, courtesy of the bourgeoisie.

What Lenin was saying in "What is to be Done" is that the working class cannot win power through trade unionism or syndicalism. Permanent revolution requires a revolutionary political party, and a good one.

Must stop there comrade.

Asikhulume! Let's dialogue!

VC






Xoli Dlabantu wrote:
Cde VC,
If Lenin lived this very day...what would he say about the Bolivarian Revolution principles...a revolution through election in three different Latin Americal states?
 
Most kind regards
Xoli Dlabantu

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 2:07 PM, DomzaNet <[email protected]> wrote:


Lenin against Syndicalism

"Demagogues are the worst enemies of the working class" - Lenin

This programme of political education texts is presently following the “Basics” course, which is the first of eight “Generic Courses” that are all accessible from the CU’s home page and from the SACP web site. Please see yesterday's post, called "Vanguard!", for instructions as to how to obtain the texts in hard copy from Jetline Print on Demand.

These Generic Courses are designed for self-organised Freirean study circles, meeting on a regular and presumably weekly basis without an outside lecturer. So, there is a main text for each week. This week, our main text has been “Worker Solidarity and Unions” from MIA, combined with Procedure of Meetings, based on Wal Hannington’s “Mr Chairman”. An introduction to these texts was sent out for yesterday, under the heading “Vanguard”.

As well as a main text each week, there is usually one or more than one supporting text, which may be regarded as supplementary, alternative, or additional reading. This week the supporting text to this discussion of the workers’ mass organisations and their necessary counterpart, the revolutionary Party, is made up of extracts from Lenin’s “What is to be Done?

Workerism

In this book Lenin was concerned to oppose what he called “economism”, which is also called “syndicalism” and in South Africa in the past and still up to now, “workerism”.

Lenin was concerned to show (following the publication of Eduard Bernstein’s gradualist “Evolutionary Socialism” and Rosa Luxemburg’s “Reform or Revolution?”) that a revolutionary transformation of society was not possible without a revolutionary political party of the working class. Trade union organisation of the working class was never going to be sufficient.

In the process Lenin was moved to denounce demagogy in the severest terms (see the quote above, which is taken from the text that we are using today. One reason that Lenin denounced demagogues so emphatically is because they misrepresent themselves as being “left” or revolutionary, when in fact they are “right”, and in particular gradualist, reformist and class-collaborationist.

Worker’s Control?

Sometimes syndicalism arrives at a point where it proposes, demagogically, “worker’s control” under capitalism. Marx and Lenin both denounced such tomfoolery – see, for example, Marx’s “Critique of the Gotha Programme

Lenin showed that the worker’s political party, the communist party, remains a “must-have”. To achieve its goals the working class must combine in a "vast association of the whole nation" and so rise above the peasant and petty-bourgeois condition of being a "sack of potatoes".

Whereas the syndicalism of individual factories or isolated mines is nothing more than a reversion to petty-bourgeois consciousness, in conditions where such petty-bourgeois behaviour is hopelessly subordinated to a bourgeois market that it cannot possibly control.

How will they sell their products, unless on the terms of the Imperialists? This is why we say that demagogy is nothing but the class enemy’s message, dressed up and re-sold in fake-revolutionary clothes. Demagogues will even be found denouncing the real revolutionaries as fakes.

When in doubt about such things, it helps to study. Lenin is a good person to study, because he was good at telling the difference between genuine things, and fakes. Especially, Lenin opposed syndicalism, workerism, gradualism reformism and economism, all of which still exist today.

Downloads:





--
Posted By DomzaNet to Communist University on 2/12/2010 02:07:00 PM --
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this address (repeat): [email protected] .

--
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this address (repeat): [email protected] .

No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2682 - Release Date: 02/11/10 18:09:00

  

--
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this address (repeat): [email protected] .

Reply via email to