I already do that, thanks.

Problem is that this gets the application to call posts/all every time the
user changes anything.  Is there an inexpensive way to get only the records
that have changed since my last call to posts/update?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joshua Schachter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 1:39 AM
> To: Ron Perry
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [delicious-discuss] Re: Quicksilver hits on the database
> 
> 
> Yes. Call posts/update and and check the timestamp; if it is 
> later than expected, get posts/all. This is an inexpensive call.
> 
> On Sun, 8 May 2005, Ron Perry wrote:
> 
> > Jon Prindiville wrote:
> >> ...
> >> The only real reason I could give for more than 1 query to 
> posts/all 
> >> would be to catch any edits to old posts,
> >>
> >> Jon
> >>
> >
> > Is there any better way to catch such changes?
> >
> > -RP
> > ---------------------
> > Ron Perry
> > http://ronp001.blogspot.com
> > http://www.tagsense.net
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.6 - Release Date: 5/6/2005
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > discuss mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> >
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.6 - Release Date: 5/6/2005
>  
> 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.6 - Release Date: 5/6/2005
 

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to