Ross,

It is now broken even in hardknott. I tried it, just as I tried it
before (it worked before).

I have no idea what the ERROR is:

zoran.s@NBK0005U:~/projects2/yocto/bbb-yocto/build$ bitbake -k
core-image-minimal
Loading cache: 100% |
                                                                | ETA:
 --:--:--
Loaded 0 entries from dependency cache.
Parsing recipes: 100%
|#################################################################################################################|
Time: 0:00:23
Parsing of 814 .bb files complete (0 cached, 814 parsed). 1438
targets, 41 skipped, 0 masked, 0 errors.
NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'cannelloni' (but
/home/zoran.s/projects2/yocto/bbb-yocto/poky/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal.bb
RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
NOTE: Runtime target 'cannelloni' is unbuildable, removing...
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['cannelloni']
ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'can-utils' (but
/home/zoran.s/projects2/yocto/bbb-yocto/poky/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal.bb
RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
NOTE: Runtime target 'can-utils' is unbuildable, removing...
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['can-utils']
ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'socketcand' (but
/home/zoran.s/projects2/yocto/bbb-yocto/poky/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal.bb
RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
NOTE: Runtime target 'socketcand' is unbuildable, removing...
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['socketcand']
ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'core-image-minimal'
No eligible RPROVIDERs exist for 'core-image-minimal'
NOTE: Runtime target 'core-image-minimal' is unbuildable, removing...
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['core-image-minimal']


And my 
/home/zoran.s/projects2/yocto/bbb-yocto/poky/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal.bb
is:

SUMMARY = "A small image just capable of allowing a device to boot."

IMAGE_INSTALL = "packagegroup-core-boot ${CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL}"

IMAGE_LINGUAS = " "

LICENSE = "MIT"

nano meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal.bb

## IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " kernel-modules"
IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " \
    kernel-modules \
    cannelloni \
    can-utils \
    socketcand \
    "

IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE ?= "8192"
IMAGE_ROOTFS_EXTRA_SPACE_append =
"${@bb.utils.contains("DISTRO_FEATURES", "systemd", " + 4096", ""
,d)}"

Zee
________

On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 12:09 PM Ross Burton <ross.bur...@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 1 Dec 2022, at 04:27, Zoran via lists.yoctoproject.org 
> <zoran.stojsavljevic=gmail....@lists.yoctoproject.org> wrote:
> > I do not understand why we need to explicitly name releases for such
> > simple generic layers?!
>
> The compatibility is because over time things change: override syntax has 
> changed, classes get added or removed, functionality may appear in bitbake.  
> Sometimes the breakage is subtle, and a layer may parse and appear to build 
> fine, but be broken.
>
> Your meta-socketcan layer is broken in honister onwards despite claiming 
> compatibility, for example.
>
> Ross
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#58701): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/58701
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/95375670/21656
Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to