On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 12:42, Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Things which used to be problematic: > > a) changes involving changes to gcc-source since it uses a shared > sources stamps which confused the tools (at least used to). That may > have been before gcc-source became a recipe? > b) changes to a very common component (e.g. autoconf-native's > do_configure) which make it hard to understand where the root cause of > the changes came from > c) changes which affect many recipes at once, e.g. the do_configure > function in base.bbclass > > It might be helpful to write test cases for the scenario you showed as > working above and some of the ones I mention above, then we can > document they work and have an easier way to add tests for issues > if/as/when we identify the problematic scenarios in future. I've now written down the tests for these three scenarios and got them to pass (in oe-selftest too \0/): https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib/commit/?h=akanavin/sstate-for-all (check the commit message too) I am going to look closer at bitbake-whatchanged, what it aims to do and why it doesn't work. I have a hunch it can produce useful high level reports, and so shouldn't be simply thrown away. 'bitbake -S printdiff' is too techy and verbose for some use cases. Maybe we can fold that functionality into 'bitbake -S whatchanged'. I'm on holiday next week. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#61156): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/61156 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/101503345/21656 Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
