On 09/05/2012 08:48 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 10:43 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
On 05/09/12 10:15, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 09:49:11 Tomas Frydrych wrote:
It has been considered witin OE to be best practice to append to BBPATH and
not prepend, the thinking being that then the search path matches the order of
the layers listed in bblayers.conf rather than the reverse.

Then meta-yocto should follow that convention ... and it needs to be
well documented, with the consequence of breaking that convention
explained, and the terrible punishments to come described in great and
sordid detail. Because this needs to be more than a convention, it needs
to be an article of faith.

I just want to clarify something here.

Its accepted that most layers will append to BBPATH. I do think its
acceptable for a distro policy layer to prepend though and this is why
meta-yocto does this. I don't remember the exact reason right now but
the principle stands.

So how should we resolve the issue in meta-ti for the denzil/1.2 branch?

I think the expediency of prepending sounds right to me. We can shoot for a better fix in 1.3.


The root of the problem is that meta-yocto mixes up policy and hardware
support which is bad. It also means its not compliant with the new Yocto
Project compliance criteria and hence is not Yocto Project Compatible.

Now we've got the compliance criteria sorted out there are some
adjustments that need to be made and I will shortly be cleaving
meta-yocto into two pieces to resolve this. I hadn't looked at this
until now mainly in case there were changes to the criteria.

FWIW I think this shows the strength of those criteria as by following
them, we'd avoid a real world problem here.

I'm glad you are thinking of doing this. I think it sets a good example and is cleaner.

However we will still need priority or namespace to override the beagleboard definition in the meta-yocto-bsp (or whatever) layer if it contains both the beagleboard reference and the atom-pc.
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Reply via email to