On 09/04/2012 01:25 PM, William Mills wrote:
> Darren: Is it true you can't get @ the Intel BSP's w/o also getting the > poky distro defs? That does seem to mixing things a bit. (I am not > claiming meta-ti is clean yet but I want to understand the Intel examples.) > It isn't something we test as part of the QA that we perform. I mostly expect people building meta-intel to be building with meta-yocto (although I wouldn't take a hard line on requiring it). That said, I removed meta-yocto from a meta-intel/meta-fri2 build and removed DISTRO=poky from my local.conf and successfully built and booted a core-image-minimal build on an FRI2 this afternoon without any changes. This was with latest master of both poky and meta-intel. I have not tried this with oe-core and bitbake pulled down separately, I'll leave that as an exercise for the reader. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Technical Lead - Linux Kernel _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto