On 09/05/2012 07:20 AM, William Mills wrote: > On 09/04/2012 07:23 PM, Darren Hart wrote: >> >> >> On 09/04/2012 01:25 PM, William Mills wrote: >> >>> Darren: Is it true you can't get @ the Intel BSP's w/o also getting the >>> poky distro defs? That does seem to mixing things a bit. (I am not >>> claiming meta-ti is clean yet but I want to understand the Intel examples.) >>> >> >> It isn't something we test as part of the QA that we perform. I mostly >> expect people building meta-intel to be building with meta-yocto >> (although I wouldn't take a hard line on requiring it). That said, I >> removed meta-yocto from a meta-intel/meta-fri2 build and removed >> DISTRO=poky from my local.conf and successfully built and booted a >> core-image-minimal build on an FRI2 this afternoon without any changes. >> > > Thanks! My confidence is restored. > > As long as including meta-yocto does not interfere with other BSPs or > distros etc then there should be no harm in your assumption. > > I would be interested to know what Mentor Graphics and Wind River do on > their products. Do they include meta-yocto? (YP is not all about > comercial OS support but I know these orginatations have done the due > diligence on layer compatibility for a non-poky distro.)
I haven't heard one way or the other, but perhaps Bruce, Sean, and Matthew could comment on that. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Technical Lead - Linux Kernel _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto