If it takes the wrong version, it could be your layers aren't in the right order. That's the first thing to check.

You might want to try to run bitbake with

-f protobuf -c cleanall or -f protobuf-native -c cleanall

This will remove all locally ;)

Then rebuild it... I haven't played much with the -native bits, so not sure how those work.



On 2016-09-01 16:34, Pietro wrote:
Herman van Hazendonk <m...@herrie.org>
writes:

Hi Pietro,

You shouldn't need to specify a version. DEPENDS = "protobuf" or
DEPENDS = "protobuf-native" should do :)

Herrie




Indeed my recipe gets built first and I can see do_protobuf_3.0.0[..](),
nonetheless when my package, which depends on libprotobuf compiles it
fails since it does not find the right version of the library.

It still finds the older version

You don't have protoc 3.0.0 installed in your path.
| Please install Google protocol buffers 3.0.0 and its compiler.
| You can find it here:
|
|    https://github.com/google/protobuf/releases/tag/v3.0.0
|
| Here is what I get when trying to evaluate your version of protoc:
|
| protoc --version
| libprotoc 2.4.1
| make: [system-check] Error 1 (ignored)
|

The version should be 3.0.0. What am I doing wrong ?





On 2016-09-01 15:40, Pietro wrote:
Pietro <pulsarpie...@posteo.net> writes:

Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.com>
writes:

On 1 September 2016 at 13:21, Herman van Hazendonk
<m...@herrie.org> wrote:

    Hi Pietro,

You can override the recipe by adding a recipe for version 3.0.0+
    in your own layer and making sure your layer has a higher
priority
    in bblayers.conf. See for example what we do in our project:

https://github.com/webOS-ports/webos-ports-setup/blob/testing/conf/bblayers.conf


    openembedded-core provides ofono 1.1.7 for example with
https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded-core/tree/krogoth/meta/recipes-
   connectivity/ofono

However we want to use ANOTHER version of ofono (1.1.7 based, but
    from a different repo/project).

    So we have our own .bbappend at
https://github.com/webOS-ports/meta-webos-ports/blob/krogoth/meta-luneos/recipes-connectiv
   ity/ofono/ofono_git.bbappend where we specify the different repo
    etc to use.

    This doesn't apply 1:1 in your case, but you could simply add a
    protobuf_3.0.0.bb in your own layer and it should build that
instead. Just make sure you have your layer at a higher position
    compared to meta-openembedded in your bblayers.conf

Thanks a lot.
I have written my own repice and added it into my own layer, it
does not compile though :

|
| autoreconf: configure.ac: tracing
|
| autoreconf: configure.ac: subdirectory gmock not present
| autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Libtool
| autoreconf: running:
|
/export/arm/pietro/PD15.1/build/tmp-glibc/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/autoconf
|
--include=/export/arm/pietro/PD15.1/build/tmp-glibc/work/cortexa8t2hf-vfp-neon-phytec-linux-gnueabi/proto
buf/3.0.0-r0/git/m4/ --force
|
| configure.ac:93: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
|
|       If this token and others are legitimate, please use
|       m4_pattern_allow.
|       See the Autoconf documentation.
|
| autoreconf:
|
/export/arm/pietro/PD15.1/build/tmp-glibc/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/autoconf
| failed with exit status: 1
|
| + bbfatal autoreconf execution failed.

I understand this is a completely different matter now, but has
anybody else seen this before ? I have tried to compile the same
revision on my local machine "natively" and it's built fine.

That library should be a dependency for another package/recipe I am
working on, is it allowed to specify a version inside the DEPENDS
recipe's clause ? I have tried to google the problem but I haven't
found
a working example as yet.

Cheers,
P.
Forget about it, I was pointing to a broken commit it.
My recipe name is protobuf_3.0.0.bb, how do I make it a dependency of
another package ?

I have tried many solution but none of them is working :
DEPENDS = "protobuf > 3.0.0" ... "protobuf_3.0.0" ... etc etc

Any thoughts ?

P.

--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Reply via email to