On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:02:06PM +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 22:25, Jean-Christian de Rivaz > <jean-christian.deri...@innodelec.ch> wrote: > > The project I work for need nodejs and chromium (and a >100MB database > > on some nodes), so space is not an issue. I need to deliver an useful > > distribution with usual commands, tools and a working console + keyboard > > for my locale. If Poky is only maintained to be tested with sysvinit + > > busybox and US locale, then I wonder if it's the appropriate choice for > > that project. There nothing wrong in providing a sysvinit + busybox > > based small distribution, this is simply not the best fit for that project. > > Installing the commands is pretty simple: be sure to install all of > util-linux core-utils psutils etc. Yes, this should be a packagegroup > to make it trivial, but this is practically a few minutes work.
My current incomplete list is:
bind-utils \
bridge-utils \
coreutils \
dnsmasq \
e2fsprogs \
e2fsprogs-resize2fs \
e2fsprogs-tune2fs \
findutils \
gawk \
grep \
inetutils-ping \
inetutils-ping6 \
inetutils-traceroute \
iproute2 \
less \
net-tools \
parted \
pciutils \
procps \
sed \
util-linux \
vim \
which \
And it's also incomplete as there's more stuff under inetutils I don't
need (but others may), and I set aside patch/diff/ed and some other
stuff I don't need. And since some of that stuff comes from
meta-openembedded, it's indeed really not clear how/where a packagegroup
would reside as we need things out of meta-networking.
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
