On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 23:55, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > My current incomplete list is: > bind-utils \ > bridge-utils \ > coreutils \ > dnsmasq \ > e2fsprogs \ > e2fsprogs-resize2fs \ > e2fsprogs-tune2fs \ > findutils \ > gawk \ > grep \ > inetutils-ping \ > inetutils-ping6 \ > inetutils-traceroute \ > iproute2 \ > less \ > net-tools \ > parted \ > pciutils \ > procps \ > sed \ > util-linux \ > vim \ > which \ > > And it's also incomplete as there's more stuff under inetutils I don't > need (but others may), and I set aside patch/diff/ed and some other > stuff I don't need. And since some of that stuff comes from > meta-openembedded, it's indeed really not clear how/where a packagegroup > would reside as we need things out of meta-networking.
That's a good start. For a oe-core packagegroup I'd suggest dropping dnsmasq bridgeutils bindutils to keep it lean. Does that remove everything from meta-networking? Also swap vim for something in core obviously. Ross Ross -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
