Can you send me the test case & your maven script, so that I can try it
from my end...? 

or log a JIRA and attach the testcase.

- Balaji

-----Original Message-----
From: Rick McGuire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 8:56 AM
To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Difference between Java 1.4.2 vs. Java 1.5

This is still giving me fits.  I was able to get the failing portion of 
my test to run outside of Maven, using java.endorsed.dirs and just the 
yoko-spec-corba jar file in the endorsed dir.  I've not been able to get

this running under Maven.  I've instrumented my failing test, and 
java.endorsed.dirs is set to the correct value, and the correct jar file

is in the directory.  Yet the test is still failing, and I've just about

run out of ideas for how to fix/debug this.  My maven scripts should be 
doing exactly what the yoko scripts are doing to run the tests, yet 
they're still failing.

Rick

Darren Middleman wrote:
> I'm not sure why the endorsed dirs property is not solving this but
yes,
> this is something that will only occur on JDK 1.5.
> The reason is because in Java 1.4, the JDK did not include an 
> implementation
> of the IORInterceptor_3_0 class, so the
> version included with Yoko is the only one it would use.  
> Unfortunately, Sun
> added an implementation of IORInterceptor_3_0
> to JDK 1.5 which differs from both the CORBA spec and the Yoko
> implementation (they use an integer parameter as an ID
> where as it should be a String).  So this is why you are seeing the
error
> now when you've moved to JDK 1.5.
>
> I would agree with Balaji and his recommendations.  See if trying to
use
> endorsed.dirs or Xbootclasspath outside of
> Maven clears things up.  I know that we have been using the 
> Xbootclasspath
> options in the READMEs for the samples
> and I don't recall seeing this issue during the testing of the demos
when
> this option was used.
>
> Darren
>
>
>
> On 9/25/06, Mosur Ravi, Balaji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi rick,
>>
>> I can't explain why it is failing in 1.5 & not in 1.4.2 but in 1.5
the
>> java.endorsed.dirs setting is definitely not picked up.
>>
>> Can you run this outside of maven & confirm if it runs with 1.5 with
the
>> java.endorsed.dirs setting or the Xbootclasspath option...?
>>
>>
>> - Balaji
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rick McGuire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 1:06 PM
>> To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Difference between Java 1.4.2 vs. Java 1.5
>>
>> I have a small module I've built for the openejb2 Yoko ORB adapter.
>> This is a fairly simple module, with not much code.  There are a
couple
>> of test cases that get run during the build, and I've configure the
>> surefile plugin to used endorsed.dir.  Everything is working great
under
>>
>> Java 1.4.2.
>>
>> Today, I tried building with Java 1.5 for the first time, and I'm
>> getting a test case failure:
>>
>>   <testcase time="1.515" name="testCORBABean"/>
>>   <testcase time="0.047" name="testOrb">
>>     <error type="java.lang.NoSuchMethodError"
>>
message="org.omg.PortableInterceptor.IORInterceptor_3_0.adapter_manager_
>> state_changed(Ljava/lang/String;S)V">java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>>
org.omg.PortableInterceptor.IORInterceptor_3_0.adapter_manager_state_cha
>> nged(Ljava/lang/String;S)V
>>     at
>>
org.apache.yoko.orb.OB.PIManager.adapterManagerStateChange(PIManager.jav
>> a:531)
>>     at
>>
org.apache.yoko.orb.OBPortableServer.POAManager_impl.activate(POAManager
>> _impl.java:212)
>>     at
>>
org.apache.yoko.orb.CosNaming.tnaming.TransientNameService.initialize(Tr
>> ansientNameService.java:128)
>>     at
>>
org.apache.yoko.orb.CosNaming.tnaming.TransientNameService.run(Transient
>> NameService.java:113)
>>     at
>>
org.openejb.corba.yoko.ORBConfigAdapter.createNameService(ORBConfigAdapt
>> er.java:149)
>>     at org.openejb.corba.NameService.doStart(NameService.java:162)
>>     at
>> org.openejb.corba.yoko.NameServiceTest.setUp(NameServiceTest.java:58)
>>     at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:125)
>>     at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106)
>>     at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124)
>>     at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)
>>     at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118)
>>     at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
>>     at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
>>     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>     at
>>
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.jav
>> a:39)
>>     at
>>
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessor
>> Impl.java:25)
>>     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
>>     at
>>
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit.JUnitTestSet.execute(JUnitTestSet.java:2
>> 10)
>>     at
>>
org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSe
>> t(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:135)
>>     at
>>
org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute(Abstr
>> actDirectoryTestSuite.java:122)
>>     at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:129)
>>     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>     at
>>
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.jav
>> a:39)
>>     at
>>
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessor
>> Impl.java:25)
>>     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
>>     at
>>
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(Suref
>> ireBooter.java:225)
>>     at
>>
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java
>> :747)
>> </error>
>>   </testcase>
>>
>>
>> Which looks like the failure I got before I started using the
endorsed
>> dir.  I'm not sure I understand what's different between 1.4.2 and
1.5
>> that would cause this error.  Strangely, the first set of test cases
ran
>>
>> OK, and I would have thought that should have give the same error if
>> there was a problem with endorsed.dir.
>>
>> Any ideas on what might be going wrong here?
>>
>> Rick
>>
>>
>


Reply via email to