On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 15:53 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 09:05:29AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >>> Will this fall back gracefully in the case where one is using, for
> >>> example,
> >>> rpm-4.4.2-37.el5? Or will the new RPM be required?
> >> The patch I sent didn't have a fallback, but it was only to demonstrate
> >> what sort of change is involved ("if <cond>: exit" in download callbacks
> >> basically). Graceful fallback to older rpm's is easily accomplished though
> >> by just checking if the necessary symbols exist in rpm bindings or not.
> >
> > I'd really, really, really appreciate it if the released version has that.
> > Thanks!
>
> Well the timing was a bit unfortunate for 3.2.2... Anyway, the rpm-part
> is now in rawhide, and the updated yum patch with fallback can be
> found here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241278
> if you want to try it out before it hits rawhide.
b/c of a hiccup in the test spin I was able to trickle this in under the
wire.
-sv
_______________________________________________
Yum-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
