On 06/06/2011 11:39 AM, James Antill wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 11:20 -0400, Raman Gupta wrote:
>> On 05/03/2011 01:30 PM, Raman Gupta wrote:
>>> What should be consistent for the sysadmin is the location of
>>> "final_file", which is local_file in the case of config_noreplace and
>>> "pkg_file" in the case of config_replace. This is the one file that is
>>> always applicable -- the final location into which all changes have to
>>> be merged.
> 
>  Maybe ... from a meld usage POV, I guess. Maybe even from a vimdiff
> POV, but I've never used vimdiff (have you?).

No, admittedly I have not. I was assuming it works like other diff
tools but perhaps that is a bad assumption.

>> Any further thoughts on this? I still think my approach is the right
>> one for sysadmins, but if the only thing preventing merging of this
>> patch is this issue, I can change the patch. After all, admins can
>> always reverse the diff using meld or vimdiff.
> 
>  If you post the patches without #2, but with the order you want for
> meld in #1 ... I'll apply them.

OK -- will do this over the next couple of days. Thanks James.

Cheers,
Raman
_______________________________________________
Yum-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel

Reply via email to