Mike:
 
Does zazen comes and goes?.  Does mindfulness comes and goes?.  It doesn't 
zazen is always available there awaiting for you.  Mindfulness is the 
same.    It only comes and goes if one CHOOSES not to do zazen or not to make 
use of the tools of mindfulness.  Your difficulty to understand mindfulness 
here is the label.  NO ONE CAN UNDERSTAND WHAT REAL MINDFULNESS IS UNLESS ONE 
HAS A TASTE OF IT.  Don't even try to understand it.  Trust me here.
 
Mayka

--- On Thu, 3/3/11, Maria Lopez <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Maria Lopez <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Zen] Realization
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, 3 March, 2011, 12:34


  








Mike:
 
zazen is a technique. Using the awareness of the in and out breathing to come 
back hone to your true home is also a technique or a tool whatever you want to 
call it.  And so what? .  Why you shouldn't made use of it if it's available 
there for you to use it when you need it?. 
 
Why you should open a can beer with your teeth when you can use your 
both hands?.  Why you should give to your teeth a hard time when you have your 
both hands to open it?
 
Mayka
 
 
--- On Thu, 3/3/11, mike brown <[email protected]> wrote:


From: mike brown <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Zen] Realization
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, 3 March, 2011, 11:31


  



Mayka,
 
Minfulness is a technique. You say it yourself when you write that it "helps 
us" to be in the present moment. But this is a fragile state to be in. You can 
calm the mind for a while thru mindfulness, but how long before it reverts back 
to its usual state of restlessness (a toothache, a fight with your boyfriend, a 
perceived insult in a post etc.)? A becalmed mind is not a peaceful mind. A 
truly peaceful mind cannot be disturbed. The nature of the Self is pure 
awareness - it can't be something that comes and goes (mindfulness).
 
Mike 





From: Maria Lopez <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thu, 3 March, 2011 19:26:57
Subject: Re: [Zen] Realization

  






Mike:
 
There is nothing of the kind of: "Trying to be mindful",  as implying "I'll be 
mindful in the future.  Unless one has been such a fool (as often happens to 
me) and regreting that one thinks to oneselve " This happens to me for not 
having being mindful, I'll try to be more mindful in the future".  This future 
is not a far away future it implies when the same situation will arise again.
 
 
There may also happens that one gets lazy about being mindful and leave for 
another day.   That kind of lazy attitude will be as much as to say: "I'll be 
sitting down zazen tomorrow" or  even better example: "Tomorrow I'll be living 
in the present moment but today let me alone!.  
 
Mindfulness always happens in the present moment.  It goes in togetherness with 
the present moment, it's in harmony with it.  But if it wouldn't be that could 
be called real mindfulness.  How it could when mindfulness it's full attention 
to everything that is going on within and around.  
 
Real Mindfulness  helps one to live with full attention and awareness of the 
present moment.  It's mindfulness that makes us become the present moment 
itself.  It's not the label of mindfulness that works out here but mindfulness 
without the label.  One has to realice it's insight by practicing, having the 
direct experience of it.  There are no words that can give a description of 
this energy with and endless grow if diligence practice is applied.  And what 
one has through it is a growing unlimited within space. (Experienced this 
during long retreat and it was beyond description)
 
 Yes, there may be a moment in which one doesn't need to practice mindfulness 
but that only will be because mindfulness becomes one second skin living way in 
daily life. 
 
Mayka
 
 
 
 
--- On Thu, 3/3/11, mike brown <[email protected]> wrote:


From: mike brown <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Zen] Realization
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, 3 March, 2011, 9:37


  



Mayka,
 
Let me see if I can find you again (I owe a debt here to Ken Wilber's talk on 
Dzogchen)! Mindfulness is one side of a duality because the other side is 
forgetfulness. Therefore you can practice mindfulness as a technique (as you 
can meditation). For  example, by trying to be 'mindful' you pay attention to 
the present moment. Trying to "be here now" necessarily implies some future 
moment when you will then be mindful. 
 
Instead, let's take a look at awareness. You can't practice awareness because 
there is only awareness (of 'I am'), whether you're in shikentaza or glued to 
the tv. Pure awareness is the present state of awareness before you try to do 
anything about it - it's this moment before you try anything. "You are already 
aware; you are already enlightened. You might not always be mindful, but you 
are always alread enlightened.". 
 
Mike
 

 




From: Maria Lopez <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thu, 3 March, 2011 5:21:21
Subject: Re: [Zen] Realization

  






Mike:
 
Are we talking about the same thing?.  You lost me now.
 
Mayka
 


--- On Wed, 2/3/11, mike brown <[email protected]> wrote:


From: mike brown <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Zen] Realization
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, 2 March, 2011, 17:27


  



Mayka,
 
Not at all! But that also answers your question about it being one side of a 
duality (mindful/not mindful). However, even if you forget to be mindful (!) - 
you're always aware of 'I am'...
 
Mike

 




From: Maria Lopez <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thu, 3 March, 2011 1:38:50
Subject: Re: [Zen] Realization

  






Mike:
No but I wish.  Are you? 
Mayka
 
 
--- On Wed, 2/3/11, mike brown <[email protected]> wrote:


From: mike brown <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Zen] Realization
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, 2 March, 2011, 15:37


  



Mayka,
 
Are you mindful 24/7? 
 
Mike





From: Maria Lopez <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thu, 3 March, 2011 0:20:44
Subject: Re: [Zen] Realization

  






Mike:  Even being 'mindful' is not 'it' as it has it's duality in forgetfullness
Mayka:  I can't see the duality of being mindful.  When there is pure 
mindfulness there is automatically "just this".  Mindfulness is full attention 
and awareness in the present moment.
 
 
 
--- On Wed, 2/3/11, mike brown <[email protected]> wrote:


From: mike brown <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Zen] Realization
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, 2 March, 2011, 11:18


  




Hi JM,
 
Thanks for the question. Meditation is the best practice that I know of, but is 
not essential. Even being 'mindful' is not 'it' as it has it's duality in 
forgetfullness. If there is a way, then it has to be simple and everywhen (a 
nod to Steve). What do we know outside of concepts, thoughts, visualisations, 
tools, witnessing etc.? We are always beyond doubt existentially aware of 'I 
am' (a further nod to Ramana Maharishi and Nisargadatta Maharal),  so this is a 
good place to start. But ultimately, even awareness of 'I am' is a product of 
the mind and so we need to go further beyond that to Pure Awareness ; ) where 
we all share the same (Buddha) Nature and nothing really needs to be done.
 
Mike





From: Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明 <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wed, 2 March, 2011 0:38:16
Subject: [Zen] Realization

  

Hi Mike,

According to your witness, is there a practice/way/how to "realize"?

Thanks,
JM
Be Enlightened In This Life - We ALL Can
http://chanjmjm.blogspot.com
http://www.heartchan.org

On 3/1/2011 2:16 AM, mike brown wrote: 
  


ED,
 
Maybe, maybe not. It still stands tho that meditation is not essential 
for enlightenment as it leads us away from Realisation. Therein lies the 
paradox - for most of us meditation was the way to Realisation.
 
Mike





From: ED <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tue, 1 March, 2011 18:20:57
Subject: Re: [Zen] Change

  



 
I believe that there are relatively few cases of individuals who have claimed 
to have become spontaneously enlightened or were born enlightened.
--ED
 
--- In [email protected], mike brown <uerusuboyo@...> wrote:
>
> Steve,
> 
> ... I empathise with the Dzogchen claim that meditation is not essential 
> for enlightenmentm but is useful for developing mindfullness, moral 
> development, 
> concentration etc. Only after Realisation is meditation essential for 
> deepening 
> the initial breakthrough.
> 
> Mike










Reply via email to