Steve, On the contrary, I do accept indeterminism. Superimposed on that, there is 'probable determism' or some other things, like god's hand. Anthony
--- On Tue, 5/4/11, SteveW <[email protected]> wrote: From: SteveW <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Zen] Why bother with Zazen? Better a Roulette To: [email protected] Date: Tuesday, 5 April, 2011, 5:09 AM --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@...> wrote: > > Steve. >  > The difference between you and me is only in definition. When I call > probability a 'law', there is no one to one relationship. However, there are > still some 'certainty' elements in it. Otherwise, the quantum mechanics would > have to be dumped. >  > Anthony > But you really don't accept indeterminacy, do you? You think that every event MUST have a determining cause. Like it or not, the evidence is against that. Steve
