I think this post is right square in the middle of the zen grid...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Mel <gunnar19632000@...> wrote:
>
> This posting is going off the zen grid a bit, but I myself had no problems 
> with the forbidden books as well as those things to do with any sexual 
> connection between Mary Magdalene and Jesus during my try-out period of a few 
> months with the Christian faith back then. The way I see it to this day, 
> nothing really changes what Yahweh/Jesus says in his holy book...author Dale 
> Brown, or not
>  
> They(some scholars) say that Jesus and Mary Magdalene shacked up(set up 
> house/love nest) together and had children afterwards, whose descendants are 
> alive today. It has also been said in the past that Mary Magdalene was 
> present somewhere in the picture of Jesus's PassOver with the disciples. As a 
> Christian of the Quaker variety(or at least, I tried to be as so) from back 
> then, I had no problem with such, because I could see that it was such an 
> insignificant matter, and didn't really affect all things scriptural
>  
> It's the same with the old man himself. Somebody can turn around and tell me 
> today that the old fella wasn't really as holy as he claimed to be from under 
> that special tree. Do I care? Must I even care? Of course not. The book Zen 
> Mind Begginer's Mind is one I keep coming back to. Reading and absorbing it 
> is not exactly getting it straight from the horse's mouth, but it's 
> beneficial to me in my own private way. For all I know, this son of Queen 
> Maha Maya could have been one of the most corrupt characters in humankind's 
> history. Good...bad...which one was he? By now, do we really care as zen 
> practitioners? Unlike some corrupt and self-proclaimed, 
> ceremony-obssessed south-east Asian and Ceylonese Buddhists I've dealt with 
> in the past I don't hold holiness to anyone in  this world of ours. Zen is my 
> chosen path, although I do not tag myself as Buddhist in any way, unless I'm 
> pressed to declare some faith or another and I can see that explaining zen
>  to the enquirer is going to cause not clarity in mind but added confusion to 
> the enquirer
>  
> Thanks for your time
>  
> in Buddha's grace
> Mel
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to