A redundant addendum to my one liner below:
Perhaps this expression of partiality would be better received if I were
to say "may only be expressed partially" rather than "is" partial - but
adding this express condition only risks perpetuating the error by
continuing to separate conceptually (rationalize) into understandings of
inner and outer/self and other/this and that...
So, when I say any/all understandings are partial I am not judging them
to be so (same error again). I am only only pointing to the nature of
this/how this appears.
All communication is dual. Everyone 'understands' this easily enough
when thinking in terms of 'self' communicating with 'others'. Few
realize the 'self' as no less 'other', 'no other' as 'no-self'.
KG
PS - We may light candles, but no one owns their light once lit.
(the possessive pronoun "their" being an irrational irony intended to
catch rational minds in reflection)
On 8/30/2012 2:18 PM, Kristopher Grey wrote:
On 8/30/2012 1:50 PM, Edgar Owen wrote:
> By have it I mean they are part of it, not that they possess it as one
> would possess a belonging...
All such understanding, is partial.
KG
