Not for me...

EDgar



On Oct 18, 2012, at 8:03 PM, Merle Lester wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
>  
>  are my emails ending up in your spam box..they are for me...what's going 
> on...merle
>  
> 
>  to me the zen is practise practise..as joe says..and it's not just sitting 
> cross-legged with a straight back like a wooden plank and saying oooooooo 
> mmmmmmmm 
> it's zenning completely 24/7/365
> 
> merle
> 
>  
> Bill,
> 
> Yes they are active Bill, but then most of them claim they aren't dong Zen 
> when they ARE being active... They claim they are doing zen only when sitting 
> passively... That's the difference..
> 
> Edgar
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 18, 2012, at 7:49 AM, Bill! wrote:
> 
>>  
>> 
>> Edgar,
>> 
>> I think most zen practitioners are very active, but not active in doing the 
>> things you and your co-conspirator Merle are looking for.  I think most zen 
>> practitioners are active changing the world from the bottom up rather than 
>> the top down.  That is changing ourselves first and then radiating out, 
>> rather than starting at trying to change the government or society first and 
>> expecting the change will then trickle down to the individual.
>> 
>> These two courses of action are discussed in detail in Arthur Koestler's 
>> excellent essay THE YOGI AND THE COMMISSAR .
>> 
>> ...Bill!
>> 
>> --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > KG for one...
>> > 
>> > What Bill! says as opposed to what he actually does for another...
>> > :-)
>> > 
>> > Edgar
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > On Oct 17, 2012, at 9:51 PM, Bill! wrote:
>> > 
>> > > Edgar and Joe,
>> > > 
>> > > Where did you get the idea that 'zen practitioners' are predominately 
>> > > passive?
>> > > 
>> > > ...Bill!
>> > > 
>> > > --- In [email protected], "Joe" desert_woodworker@ wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Edgar,
>> > > > 
>> > > > Welcome home!
>> > > > 
>> > > > Right.
>> > > > 
>> > > > And if you knew Aitken Roshi, you'd be exhausted by now even just 
>> > > > FOLLOWING the activism that he engaged in, much less participating in 
>> > > > it with him. ;-)
>> > > > 
>> > > > But I don't know where the notion of passivity of/as Zen practitioners 
>> > > > comes from, which you mention. That may be the outsiders' view, due to 
>> > > > "media" lack of understanding, going just one half millimeter deep; 
>> > > > but it's not the view from the inside / our side. As you know!
>> > > > 
>> > > > Whatever's necessary is what GOES. Look out, passivists, and 
>> > > > paci-fists. Here come REAL Fists! We are the true kung-fu. ;-)
>> > > > 
>> > > > Nihilism is knee-hilism: Not in MY "zen"! ;-)
>> > > > 
>> > > > Zen-mind operates in a way opposite to "total passivity and nihilism'; 
>> > > > never heard of such baloney / bullshit before now, in all my life. It 
>> > > > is the Life-of-Life, instead; and not a sickly concept. Again, you 
>> > > > know.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Just agreeing with you.
>> > > > 
>> > > > --Joe
>> > > > 
>> > > > > Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Merle,
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > Absolutely admirable!
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > In spite of what some would have us believe Zen does not require 
>> > > > > total passivity and nihilism.
>> > > >
>> > > 
>> > >
>> >
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to