I can get dressed perfectly well without activating any reasoning circuits.
Subconscious planning and spatial understanding circuits may be used. But
not what I mean by rational thought, nor what I think Bill! means by
rational thought.

It is perfectly possible to put pants on without using any rational
thinking at all, just the unconscious firing of neurons.

--Chris

Thanks,
--Chris
301-270-6524
 On May 25, 2013 8:57 AM, "Edgar Owen" <edgaro...@att.net> wrote:

>
>
> Chris,
>
> Yes, if you manage to put your pants on in the morning you ARE using your
> rational mind.
>
> Bill obviously walks around without pants all day hoping to preserve his
> Zen...
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
> On May 25, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Chris Austin-Lane wrote:
>
>
>
> I say the thoughts have actual reality and a limited illusory implicit
> world view they carry with them.
>
> I don't find much reason to distinguish the neuronal firings of hearing a
> frog jumping into the water and the neuronal firings of remembering a frog
> jumping into water. But to take a thought seriously, haha, that way leads
> to madness.
>
> The fact of maths being so effective in science is still in my mind part
> of the mystery, and some little model of computation cribbed from recent
> popular science fails to address it.
>
> I also am pretty sure one may put pants on without having an effective
> reasonable model of computation externalized.  One may just put the pants
> on.
>
> Thanks,
> --Chris
> 301-270-6524
>  On May 25, 2013 7:10 AM, "Bill!" <billsm...@hhs1963.org> wrote:
>
>> Edgar,
>>
>> People create illusions so why can't people decide on whether they're
>> real or not?
>>
>> I say they're not.
>>
>> ...Bill!
>>
>> --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Bill,
>> >
>> > People don't decide whether illusions are real or not. Reality does!
>> Get that through your solipsistic head!
>> >
>> > Edgar
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On May 25, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Bill! wrote:
>> >
>> > > Edgar,
>> > >
>> > > As long as you agree dualism is an illusion you can call it 'reality'
>> if you wish. I don't agree, but we can let others decide for themselves if
>> illusions are real or not.
>> > >
>> > > ...Bill!
>> > >
>> > > --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Bill,
>> > > >
>> > > > Total agreement as stated.
>> > > >
>> > > > Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in
>> reality instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole meaning..
>> > > >
>> > > > Edgar
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Siska,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar
>> opposite opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably disagree
>> with this statement ;>) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this
>> post.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I looked for my self,
>> > > > > But my self was gone.
>> > > > > The boundaries of my being
>> > > > > Had disappeared in the sea.
>> > > > > Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
>> > > > > And a voice returned me to myself.
>> > > > > It always happens like this.
>> > > > > Sea turns on itself and foams,
>> > > > > And with every foaming bit another body.
>> > > > > Another being takes form.
>> > > > > And when the sea sends word,
>> > > > > Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
>> > > > > - Rumi
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves
>> form, come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves
>> by slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later
>> composing this poem. My interpretation of it is:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I looked for my self,
>> > > > > But my self was gone.
>> > > > > The boundaries of my being
>> > > > > Had disappeared in the sea.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature. The
>> illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something
>> independent and apart from everything else has vanished with it. It has
>> vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
>> > > > > And a voice returned me to myself.
>> > > > > It always happens like this.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has
>> been interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This alternation
>> between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly,
>> much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Sea turns on itself and foams,
>> > > > > And with every foaming bit another body.
>> > > > > Another being takes form.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions,
>> perceptions, thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > And when the sea sends word,
>> > > > > Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions
>> melt back into emptiness.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see
>> what Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ...Bill!
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi Bill,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I followed until: "Waves broke".
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Siska
>> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > > From: "Bill!" BillSmart@
>> > > > > > Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
>> > > > > > Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
>> > > > > > To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
>> > > > > > Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
>> > > > > > Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > ..Bill!
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
>> reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> 

Reply via email to