On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Martin Sustrik <sust...@250bpm.com> wrote: > >> What about the generated documentation though? > > Like I said, generated documentation can go to any suitable medium. > >> What Peter have done is generated documentation for 0MQ codebase (as >> opposed to API) which falls into the same category. > > Indeed. Sorry, I meant "codebase" when I wrote "API"... I assume the > generated documentation is for methods and classes, which means 'api' > to my mind. > > Generating documentation is an experiment which may or may not > succeed. Presumably it can, if people put enough effort into the > code. This is a separate issue from making the documentation > (overall, all types) more accessible.
Pieter, I apologize for any misunderstanding. I only meant to open a discussion. I actually didn't intend or propose to move zeromq.org away from Wikidot. But, I was proposing quick and easy access to all aspects of information regarding zeromq, what ever form that may take. As for generating code base docs for contributer usage.. after running a quick script to change comment tokens from '//' to '//!' in the header files of my repo, I generated this first draft doc[1] from doxygen. Click some links.. even without any other changes it's quite useful to contributers, imo. ~Peter http://travlr.github.com/zeromq2/ > > -Pieter > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
