Martin Lucina wrote: > I've re-read all of them several times and it would seem that no, they are > not valid. I'd still like some opinion from Martin Sustrik though, since he > implemented the current behaviour, whether by accident or by design.
Well, every time I see a corner case handled in a special way I imagine a programmer, some day, some place, banging his head against the wall. Then writing a workaround. Then maintaining the workaround. The being waked up at 3am because of bug in the workaround. Then banging his head again. Etc. In other words, 100% coherent algorithm is good because it plays well with generic algorithms. On the other hand, trying to save newbies from harming themselves is a noble effort. So the question is whether 0MQ is supposed to be a tool for little old ladies -- tame and friendly -- or a tool for real men -- 100% coherent, dangerous and unforgiving. Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
