On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Alexey Ermakov <[email protected]> wrote:
> That would be great as an additional type of socket (ZMQ_FILTER) > connectable to a ZMQ_PUB socket. Throwing out ZMQ_SUB sockets or > having them to do “helpful” stuff like autosubscribing to everything > on poll()/recv() would make lots and lots of uses (like market data > subscriptions, an example that's used in tutorials by each and every > messaging framework) impossible. Did I propose that? For market data use cases nothing would change except some API terminology. In fact the proposition only changes one use case (no subscriptions). What it does is turn the language around to fit common experience. People used to market data and messaging frameworks will have no trouble either way, they have been experts at this for years. - Pieter Hintjens iMatix - www.imatix.com _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
