On Aug 17, 2010, at 1:46 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote: > Martin Lucina wrote: > >> I've re-read all of them several times and it would seem that no, >> they are >> not valid. I'd still like some opinion from Martin Sustrik though, >> since he >> implemented the current behaviour, whether by accident or by design. > > Well, every time I see a corner case handled in a special way I > imagine > a programmer, some day, some place, banging his head against the wall. > Then writing a workaround. Then maintaining the workaround. The being > waked up at 3am because of bug in the workaround. Then banging his > head > again. Etc. > > In other words, 100% coherent algorithm is good because it plays well > with generic algorithms. > > On the other hand, trying to save newbies from harming themselves is a > noble effort. > > So the question is whether 0MQ is supposed to be a tool for little old > ladies -- tame and friendly -- or a tool for real men -- 100% > coherent, > dangerous and unforgiving. >
old ladies can use CORBA & Co. /me want FERRARI plz +1 > Martin > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
