On Apr 4, 2012, at 5:44 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Colin Johnsun <colin.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I agree with all previous posters, +1 on 2.2. Semver is easy to >> understand. You could refactor the code as much as you want but if it >> doesn't change the ABI then it is should only be 2.x.x release. > > OK, we have consensus. > > I've renamed the github repo to zeromq2-x, so anyone who's cloned this > will have to fix-up their remotes. > > We're ready to go for a 2.2.0 release then. Nice work, everyone.
This is how it is supposed to work. Good dialogue, everyone. cr _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
