Richard Florida, Tracking the 'Creative Class'

  NPR | May 22, 2005 
  http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4659576

 
Three years ago, Richard Florida argued in his book The Rise of the 
Creative Class that artists and entrepreneurs, scientists and health 
care professionals drive American business innovation. Cities and 
regions will thrive by providing an open, tolerant environment 
for "cultural creatives," he said. 

Now the public policy professor has taken his argument global in a 
new book: The Flight of the Creative Class. He also sounds an alarm: 
the United States may be on the verge of losing its competitive edge 
in attracting innovators. 

Read an excerpt:

>From the First Chapter of Flight of the Creative Class:

In March of 2003, I had the opportunity to meet Peter Jackson, the 
Academy Award-winning director of the Lord of the Rings trilogy, at 
his film complex in lush, green, otherworldly Wellington, New 
Zealand. Jackson has done something unlikely in Wellington, a 
smallish but exciting cosmopolitan city of roughly 400,000, and one 
certainly not previously considered a global cultural capital. He 
has built a permanent facility there that is considered one of the 
world's most sophisticated filmmaking complexes. And he did it in 
New Zealand for a reason.

Jackson, a Wellington native, realized what many American cities 
discovered during the 1990s: that paradigm-busting creative 
industries could single-handedly change the way cities flourish 
while driving dynamic and widespread economic change. It took 
Jackson and his partners a while to raise the resources, but they 
eventually purchased an abandoned paint factory that, emblematic in 
its adaptive transformation and reuse, emerged as the studio 
responsible for the most breathtaking trilogy of films ever made. He 
realized, Jackson told me, that with the allure of the Lord of the 
Rings movies he would be able to attract a diverse array of creative 
talent from around the world, enticing the best cinematographers, 
costume designers, sound technicians, computer-graphic artists, 
model builders, editors, and animators to New Zealand.

Sure enough, during my visit to Wellington, I met dozens of 
Americans from universities such as the University of California at 
Berkeley and MIT working alongside talented filmmakers from Europe 
and Asia. Many had begun the process of establishing residency in 
New Zealand, ready to relinquish their American citizenship for what 
they saw as greener creative pastures. One of them, a digital 
wunderkind from the San Francisco Bay area, told me he was launching 
his new high-tech start-up in Wellington because of the technology 
infrastructure and environment there, which in his case created 
advantages that trumped even Silicon Valley. As we walked past a 
world map with pins stuck in employees' native countries, the head 
of digital animation joked that the organization looked more like 
the UN than a film production studio.

Think about this. In an industry synonymous with America's 
international economic and cultural might, film production, the 
single greatest project in recent cinematic history was 
internationally funded and crafted by the best filmmakers from 
around the world. But not in Hollywood.

When Hollywood produces movies, it creates jobs for directors, 
actors, and key grips in California. Because of the astounding level 
of technical innovation required by films of Rings' magnitude-in 
areas from computer graphics and animation to sound design-such a 
project also germinates whole new companies, and even new nationwide 
industries. George Lucas's Star Wars films, for instance, almost 
single-handedly sparked the advancement of everything from video 
games to product tie-in marketing. The lion's share of economic 
benefits from the Rings trilogy, though, is likely to accrue not to 
the United States but to New Zealand. In an equally mighty display 
of economic irony, Jackson's remake of King Kong is also being put 
together in Wellington, with a budget running upward of $150 million.

Peter Jackson's accomplishment in tiny Wellington hasn't factored 
into any of the ongoing debates over global economic 
competitiveness. But the United States of America is now facing its 
greatest challenge since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. This 
challenge has little to do with business costs and even less with 
manufacturing prowess. And, no, the main competitive threats are not 
China or India. Our country-for generations known around the world 
as the land of opportunity and innovation -- may well be on the 
verge of losing its creative competitive edge.

The core of this challenge is what I've come to see as the new 
global competition for talent, a phenomenon that promises to radically reshape 
the world in the coming decades. No longer will economic might amass in 
countries according to their natural 
resources, manufacturing excellence, military dominance, or even 
scientific and technological prowess. Today, the terms of 
competition revolve around a central axis: a nation's ability to 
mobilize, attract, and retain human creative talent. Every key 
dimension of international economic leadership, from manufacturing 
excellence to scientific and technological advancement, will depend 
on this ability.

This new global competition for talent creates a serious threat to 
the United States' long-standing economic hegemony on three 
overlapping fronts. First, a wide range of countries around the 
world are increasing their ability to compete for global talent. 
Second, the United States is undermining its own ability to compete 
for that talent. And third, the U.S. is failing to cultivate and 
harness the full creative capabilities of its own people in ways 
that position it to compete effectively.





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
What would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater?
Donate or volunteer in the arts today at Network for Good!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/TzSHvD/SOnJAA/79vVAA/NJYolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

��������������������������������������������������������
This is ZESTEconomics. Post economics-related articles and event info to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTEconomics by sending a 
blank mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, visit 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/join

==theZESTcommunity======================================

[1] ZESTCurrent: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCurrent/
[2] ZESTEconomics: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/
[3] ZESTGlobal: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/
[4] ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/
[5] ZESTPoets: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTPoets/
[6] ZESTCaste: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/
[7] ZESTAlternative: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTAlternative/
[8] TalkZEST: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TalkZEST/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to