Hello David, Thursday, January 25, 2007, 1:47:57 AM, you wrote:
DM> On Jan 24, 2007, at 04:06, Bryan Cantrill wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:15:21AM -0700, Jason J. W. Williams wrote: >>> Wow. That's an incredibly cool story. Thank you for sharing it! Does >>> the Thumper today pretty much resemble what you saw then? >> >> Yes, amazingly so: 4-way, 48 spindles, 4u. The real beauty of the >> match between ZFS and Thumper was (and is) that ZFS unlocks new >> economics >> in storage -- smart software achieving high performance and ultra-high DM> If Thumper and ZFS were born independently, how were all those disks DM> going to be used without ZFS? It seems logical that the two be mated, DM> but AFAIK there is no hardware RAID available in Thumpers. DM> Was "normal" software RAID the plan? Treating each disk as a separate DM> mount point? I guess Linux was considered probably with LVM or something else. -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
