> Similarly, read block size does not make a 
> significant difference to the sequential read speed.

Last time I did a simple bench using dd, supplying the record size as
blocksize to it instead of no blocksize parameter bumped the mirror pool
speed from 90MB/s to 130MB/s.

-mg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to