Austin wrote: > I've been trying to figure out how the copies command works and have been > experimenting, but I haven't really seen any results (both with 5 physical > drives I will soon add to my data pool as a 2nd RAIDZ and on a virtual > machine with two RAIDZ in a pool). First: Is data copied across physical > devices or virtual devices in a pool (thus could it work with a single RAIDZ, > or would I need multiple virtual devices in the pool)? I've been trying to > add some redundancy to my personal files in a RAID-Z array so that if two > drives go down my important data will still be safe, but experimentation has > led to me seeing no redundancy for filesystems set with copies=3 before > copying dat to them. I have tried downing two out of 5 drives in a single > RAIDZ pool and downing 2/3 drives in one RAIDZ in a dual-RAIDZ pool. >
I made some pretty pictures describing copies at: http://blogs.sun.com/relling/entry/zfs_copies_and_data_protection The most common failure mode is unrecoverable read, not complete disk failure. Copies is a good technique to help protect you from unrecoverable reads. -- richard _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss