On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:09 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/04/2008 02:19:23 AM: >> >>> Jorgen Lundman wrote: >>> >>> > We did ask our vendor, but we were just told that AVS does not support >>> > x4500. >>> >>> >>> The officially supported AVS works on the X4500 since the X4500 came >>> out. But, although Jim Dunham and others will tell you otherwise, I >>> absolutely can *not* recommend using it on this hardware with ZFS, >>> especially with the larger disk sizes. At least not for important, or >>> even business critical data - in such a case, using X41x0 servers with >>> J4500 JBODs and a HAStoragePlus Cluster instead of AVS may be a much >>> better and more reliable option, for basically the same price. >>> >> >> Ralf, >> >> War wounds? Could you please expand on the why a bit more? > > +1 I'd also be interested in more details. > > Thanks, > > -- > Al Hopper Logical Approach Inc,Plano,TX [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Voice: 972.379.2133 Timezone: US CDT > OpenSolaris Governing Board (OGB) Member - Apr 2005 to Mar 2007 > http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/ogb_2005-2007/ > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss >
Story time! -- Brent Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
