On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Nathan Kroenert wrote: > > That being said, there is a large delta in your results and mine... If I get > a chance, I'll look into it... > > I suspect it's a cached versus I/O issue...
The first time I posted was the first time the directory has been read in well over a month so it was not currently cached. You might find this to be interesting since it shows that the 'rt' options are taking most of the time: % ptime ls -1 | wc -l real 5.497 user 4.825 sys 0.654 1000000 I will certainly agree that huge directories can cause problems for many applications, particularly ones that access the files over a network. Bob ====================================== Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
