On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Mike Gerdts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Greg Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nevada isn't production code.  For real ZFS testing, you must use a
>> production release, currently Solaris 10 (update 5, soon to be update 6).
>
> I misstated before in my LDoms case.  The corrupted pool was on
> Solaris 10, with LDoms 1.0.  The control domain was SX*E, but the
> zpool there showed no problems.  I got into a panic loop with dangling
> dbufs.  My understanding is that this was caused by a bug in the LDoms
> manager 1.0 code that has been fixed in a later release.  It was a
> supported configuration, I pushed for and got a fix.  However, that
> pool was still lost.

Or maybe it wasn't fixed yet.  I see that this was committed just today.

6684721 file backed virtual i/o should be synchronous

http://hg.genunix.org/onnv-gate.hg/rev/eb40ff0c92ec

-- 
Mike Gerdts
http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to