2008/10/10 Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Timh Bergström wrote: >> >> 2008/10/9 Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> >>> On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Miles Nordin wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> catastrophically. If this is really the situation, then ZFS needs to >>>> give the sysadmin a way to isolate and fix the problems >>>> deterministically before filling the pool with data, not just blame >>>> the sysadmin based on nebulous speculatory hindsight gremlins. >>>> >>>> And if it's NOT the case, the ZFS problems need to be acknowledged and >>>> fixed. >>>> >>> >>> Can you provide any supportive evidence that ZFS is as fragile as you >>> describe? >>> >> >> The hundreds of sysadmins seeing their pools go byebye after normal >> operations in a production environment is evidence enough. And the >> number of times people like Victor have saved our asses. >> > > Hundreds? Do you have evidence of this?
One is one to many, I dont need evidence of hundreds - that is hopefully an exaggeration. //T > -- richard > > _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
