Hi Ross Ross Smith wrote: > Thanks, that got it working. I'm still only getting 10MB/s, so it's not > solved my problem - I've still got a bottleneck somewhere, but mbuffer is a > huge improvement over standard zfs send / receive. It makes such a > difference when you can actually see what's going on.
I'm currently trying to investigate this a bit. One of our user's home directories is extremely slow to 'zfs send'. It started yesterday afternoon at about 1600+0200 and is still running and has only copied less than 50% of the whole tree: On the receiving side zfs get tells me: atlashome/BACKUP/XXX used 193G - atlashome/BACKUP/XXX available 17.2T - atlashome/BACKUP/XXX referenced 193G - atlashome/BACKUP/XXX compressratio 1.81x - So close 350 GB are transferred and about 500 GB to go. More later. Carsten _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
