> > I don't want to steer you wrong under the > circumstances, > so I think we need more information. > > First, is the failure the same as in the earlier part > of this > thread. I.e., when you boot, do you get a failure > like this? > > Warning: Fcode sequence resulted in a net stack depth > change of 1 > Evaluating: > > Evaluating: > > The file just loaded does not appear to be executable
Nope: ==================================================== Sun Fire T200, No Keyboard Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. OpenBoot 4.27.4, 16256 MB memory available, Serial #75621394. Ethernet address 0:14:4f:81:e4:12, Host ID: 8481e412. Boot device: /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED] File and args: ufs-file-system Loading: /platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200/boot_archive Loading: /platform/sun4v/boot_archive Can't open boot_archive Evaluating: The file just loaded does not appear to be executable. ======================================================= > > Second, at least at first glance, this looks like > more of > a generic patch problem than a problem specifically > related to zfs boot. Since this is S10, not > OpenSolaris, > perhaps you should be escalating this through the > standard support channels. This alias probably > won't get you any really useful answers on general > problems with patching. Yeah I just thought since I'd followed this thread before it might be useful to add to it since there might be crossover issues. I'll keep pushing on the string. I hate being the annoying customer who says "I won't follow your suggestion because (blah) please escalate this ticket." I hope to move these systems over to 10u6 in a few months and streamline our patching so problems like this won't exist. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
