ok, Scott, that sounded sincere. I am not going to do the pic thing on you.

But do I have to spell this out to you -- somethings are invented not for 
home use?

Cindy, would you want to do ZFS at home, or just having some wine and music?

Can we focus on commercial usage?
please!



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Laird" <sc...@sigkill.org>
To: "Brandon High" <bh...@freaks.com>
Cc: <zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org>; "Peter Korn" <peter.k...@sun.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS + OpenSolaris for home NAS?


> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Brandon High <bh...@freaks.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Joel Buckley <joel.buck...@sun.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> How much is your time worth?
>>
>> Quite a bit.
>>
>>> Consider the engineering effort going into every Sun Server.
>>> Any system from Sun is more than sufficient for a home server.
>>> You want more disks, then buy one with more slots.  Done.
>>
>> A few years ago, I put together the NAS box currently in use at home
>> for $300 for 1TB of space. Mind you, I recycled the RAM from another
>> box and the four 250GB disks were free. I think 250 drives were around
>> $200 at the time, so let's say the system price was $1200.
>>
>> I don't think there's a Sun server that takes 4+ drives anywhere near
>> $1200. The X4200 uses 2.5" drives, but costs $4255. Actually adding
>> more drives ups the cost further. That means the afternoon I spent
>> setting my server up was worth $3000. I should tell my boss that.
>>
>> A more reasonable comparison would be the Ultra 24. A system with
>> 4x250 drives is $1650. I could build a 4 TB system today for *less*
>> than my 1TB system of 2 years ago, so let's use 3x750 + 1x250 drives.
>> (That's all the store will let me) and the price jumps to $2641.
>>
>> Assume that I buy the cheapest x64 system (the X2100 M2 at $1228) and
>> add a drive tray because I want 4 drives ... well I can't. The
>> cheapest drive tray is $7465.
>>
>> I have trouble justifying Sun hardware for many business applications
>> that don't require SPARC, let alone for the home. For custom systems
>> that most tinkerers would want at home, a shop like Silicon Mechanics
>> (http://www.siliconmechanics.com/) (or even Dell or HP) is almost
>> always a better deal on hardware.
>
> I agree completely.  About a year ago I spent around $800 (w/o drives)
> on a NAS box for home.  I used a 4x PCI-X single-Xeon Supermicro MB, a
> giant case, and a single 8-port Supermicro SATA card.  Then I dropped
> a pair of 80 GB boot drives and 9x 500 GB drives into it.  With raidz2
> plus a spare, that gives me around 2.7T of usable space.  When I
> filled that up a few weeks back, I bought 2 more 8-port SATA cards, 2
> Supermicro CSE-M35T-1B 5-drive hot-swap bays, and 9 1.5T drives, all
> for under $2k.  That's around $0.25/GB for the expansion and $0.36
> overall, including last year's expensive 500G drives.
>
> The closest that I can come to this config using current Sun hardware
> is probably the X4540 w/ 500G drives; that's $35k for 14T of usable
> disk (5x 8-way raidz2 + 1 spare + 2 boot disks), $2.48/GB.  It's much
> nicer hardware but I don't care.  I'd also need an electrician (for 2x
> 240V circuits), a dedicated server room in my house (for the fan
> noise), and probably a divorce lawyer :-).
>
> Sun's hardware really isn't price-competitive on the low end,
> especially when commercial support offerings have no value to you.
> There's nothing really wrong with this, as long as you understand that
> Sun's really only going to be selling into shops where Sun's support
> and extra engineering makes financial sense.  In Sun's defense, this
> is kind of an odd system, specially built for unusual requirements.
>
> My NAS box works well enough for me.  It's probably eaten ~20 hours of
> my time over the past year, partially because my Solaris is really
> rusty and partially because pkg has left me with broken, unbootable
> systems twice :-(.  It's hard to see how better hardware would have
> helped with that, though.
>
>
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss 

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to