Tonmaus wrote:
I am lacking 1 TB on my pool:
u...@filemeister:~$ zpool list daten NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE
CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT daten 10T 3,71T 6,29T 37% 1.00x
ONLINE - u...@filemeister:~$ zpool status daten pool: daten state:
ONLINE scrub: none requested config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM daten ONLINE 0
0 0 raidz2-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c10t2d0 ONLINE
0 0 0 c10t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c10t4d0 ONLINE
0 0 0 c10t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c10t6d0 ONLINE
0 0 0 c10t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c10t8d0 ONLINE
0 0 0 c10t9d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c11t18d0 ONLINE
0 0 0 c11t19d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c11t20d0 ONLINE
0 0 0 spares c11t21d0 AVAIL
errors: No known data errors u...@filemeister:~$ zfs list daten NAME
USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT daten 3,01T 4,98T 110M /daten
I am counting 11 disks 1 TB each in a raidz2 pool. This is 11 TB
gross capacity, and 9 TB net. Zpool is however stating 10 TB and zfs
is stating 8TB. The difference between net and gross is correct, but
where is the capacity from the 11th disk going?
My guess is unit conversion and rounding. Your pool has 11 base 10 TB,
which is 10.2445 base 2 TiB.
Likewise your fs has 9 base 10 TB, which is 8.3819 base 2 TiB.
--
Carson
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss