Tonmaus wrote:

I am lacking 1 TB on my pool:

u...@filemeister:~$ zpool list daten NAME    SIZE  ALLOC   FREE
CAP  DEDUP  HEALTH  ALTROOT daten    10T  3,71T  6,29T    37%  1.00x
ONLINE  - u...@filemeister:~$ zpool status daten pool: daten state:
ONLINE scrub: none requested config:

NAME          STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM daten         ONLINE       0
0     0 raidz2-0    ONLINE       0     0     0 c10t2d0   ONLINE
0     0     0 c10t3d0   ONLINE       0     0     0 c10t4d0   ONLINE
0     0     0 c10t5d0   ONLINE       0     0     0 c10t6d0   ONLINE
0     0     0 c10t7d0   ONLINE       0     0     0 c10t8d0   ONLINE
0     0     0 c10t9d0   ONLINE       0     0     0 c11t18d0  ONLINE
0     0     0 c11t19d0  ONLINE       0     0     0 c11t20d0  ONLINE
0     0     0 spares c11t21d0    AVAIL

errors: No known data errors u...@filemeister:~$ zfs list daten NAME
USED  AVAIL  REFER  MOUNTPOINT daten  3,01T  4,98T   110M  /daten

I am counting 11 disks 1 TB each in a raidz2 pool. This is 11 TB
gross capacity, and 9 TB net. Zpool is however stating 10 TB and zfs
is stating 8TB. The difference between net and gross is correct, but
where is the capacity from the 11th disk going?

My guess is unit conversion and rounding. Your pool has 11 base 10 TB, which is 10.2445 base 2 TiB.

Likewise your fs has 9 base 10 TB, which is 8.3819 base 2 TiB.

--
Carson
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to