On Wed, April 14, 2010 11:51, Tonmaus wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, April 14, 2010 08:52, Tonmaus wrote:
>> > safe to say: 2009.06 (b111) is unusable for the
>> purpose, ans CIFS is dead
>> > in this build.
>>
>> That's strange; I run it every day (my home Windows
>> "My Documents" folder
>> and all my photos are on 2009.06).
>>
>>
>> -bash-3.2$ cat /etc/release
>> OpenSolaris 2009.06 snv_111b
>>  X86
>> Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc.  All
>> Rights Reserved.
>> Use is subject to license
>>  terms.
>>                              Assembled 07 May 2009
>
>
> I would be really interested how you got past this
> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=11371
> which I was so badly bitten by that I considered giving up on OpenSolaris.


I don't get random hangs in normal use; so I haven't done anything to "get
past" this.

I DO get hangs when funny stuff goes on, which may well be related to that
problem (at least they require a reboot).  Hmmm; I get hangs sometimes
when trying to send a full replication stream to an external backup drive,
and I have to reboot to recover from them.  I can live with this, in the
short term.  But now I'm feeling hopeful that they're fixed in what I'm
likely to be upgrading to next.

>>  not sure if this is best choice. I'd like to
>>  hear from others as well.
>> Well, it's technically not a stable build.
>>
>> I'm holding off to see what 2010.$Spring ends up
>> being; I'll convert to
>> that unless it turns into a disaster.
>>
>> Is it possible to switch to b132 now, for example?  I
>> don't think the old
>> builds are available after the next one comes out; I
>> haven't been able to
>> find them.
>
> There are methods to upgrade to any dev build by pkg. Can't tell you from
> the top of my head, but I have done it with success.
>
> I wouldn't know why to go to 132 instead of 133, though. 129 seems to be
> an option.

Because 132 was the most current last time I paid much attention :-).  As
I say, I'm currently holding out for 2010.$Spring, but knowing how to get
to a particular build via package would be potentially interesting for the
future still.  Having been told it's possible helps, makes it worth
looking harder.

-- 
David Dyer-Bennet, d...@dd-b.net; http://dd-b.net/
Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/
Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/
Dragaera: http://dragaera.info

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to