"Garrett D'Amore" <garr...@nexenta.com> wrote:
> All of this is entirely legal conjecture, by people who aren't lawyers,
> for issues that have not been tested by court and are clearly subject to
> interpretation. Since it no longer is relevant to the topic of the
> list, can we please either take the discussion offline, or agree to just
> let the topic die (on the basis that there cannot be an authoritative
> answer until there is some case law upon which to base it?)
Garret, I did reply to your mail because you quoted claims from people who
aren't lawyers and who do not give evidence for their claims.
As I know that is makes no sense to discuss claims from non-lawyers, I replied
with quotes and statements I did read from lawyers.
I am no lawyer, but I talk with lawyers on Copyright and licensing issues and
I try to ignore legal claims from anybody who does not give evidence for his
claims.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
