-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

If I remember correctly, ESX always uses synchronous writes over NFS. If
so, adding a dedicated log device (such as a DDRdrive) might help you
out here. You should be able to test it by disabling the ZIL for a short
while and see if performance improves
(http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#Disabling_the_ZIL_.28Don.27t.29).
I'm not sure how reliable the DDRdrive is in practice, but in theory it
should be much better than an SSD, since DRAM doesn't wear.

- --
Saso

On 08/27/2010 07:04 AM, Mark wrote:
> We are using a 7210, 44 disks I believe, 11 stripes of RAIDz sets.  When I 
> installed I selected the best bang for the buck on the speed vs capacity 
> chart.
> 
> We run about 30 VM's on it, across 3 ESX 4 servers.  Right now, its all 
> running NFS, and it sucks... sooo slow.
> 
> iSCSI was no better.   
> 
> I am wondering how I can increase the performance, cause they want to add 
> more vm's... the good news is most are idleish, but even idle vm's create a 
> lot of random chatter to the disks!
> 
> So a few options maybe... 
> 
> 1) Change to iSCSI mounts to ESX, and enable write-cache on the LUN's since 
> the 7210 is on a UPS.
> 2) get a Logzilla SSD mirror.  (do ssd's fail, do I really need a mirror?)
> 3) reconfigure the NAS to a RAID10 instead of RAIDz
> 
> Obviously all 3 would be ideal , though with a SSD can I keep using NFS for 
> the same performance since the R_SYNC's would be satisfied with the SSD?
> 
> I am dreadful of getting the OK to spend the $$,$$$ SSD's and then not get 
> the performance increase we want.
> 
> How would you weight these?  I noticed in testing on a 5 disk OpenSolaris, 
> that changing from a single RAIDz pool to RAID10 netted a larger IOP increase 
> then adding an Intel SSD as a Logzilla.  That's not going to scale the same 
> though with a 44 disk, 11 raidz striped RAID set.
> 
> Some thoughts?  Would simply moving to write-cache enabled iSCSI LUN's 
> without a SSD speed things up a lot by itself?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkx3gMQACgkQRO8UcfzpOHDL7ACfW43C6lkMD389j/vmldqMDK1f
1H0AoNFdhgHfWKCCMaJQ2DJACpkQicU7
=KIyA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to