Ian Collins <i...@ianshome.com> wrote:
> But they are involved in the discussions around which features should be
> there, and help to prioritise those features.
>
> I guess my fear is the external ZFS developers have adopted the Oracle
> rather than the OpenSolaris development model. We all know where that
> leads....
>
> I hope my fears are misplaced.
I mentioned several times already that in case that Oracle does ot like an open
development model that allows input to ZFS from anywhere, then we need a change
in the way that ZFS features are implemented and documented.
It is no longer sufficient to have a ZFS or zpool version number but we need
version tags with pairs of vendor/feature.
As long as this does not happen, ZFS is not ready for closed development inside
Oracle.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
