On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Matt Harrison <iwasinnamuk...@genestate.com> wrote: > On 01/06/2011 20:52, Eric Sproul wrote:
>> What files would those be? Usually the pool name (and therefore the >> dataset names) doesn't matter-- only mountpoints matter to most things >> on the system, but maybe you have a more interesting use case. :) >> >> Eric > > Nothing that impressive :D I have quite a few scripts and config files that > of course access the data via the mountpoint, which in my case refers to the > pool name. It's just slightly possible I exaggerated the number of files, > but still I'd prefer not to do it at all. :) > But Cindy has just chimed in and confirmed that I can indeed just import the > pool under the old name. I think Eric's point was that the zpool/zfs name and the mountpoint do NOT have to be the same. See the zfs "mountpoint" property (zfs get mountpoint <zfs> and zfs set mountpoint=<foo> <zfs>). -- {--------1---------2---------3---------4---------5---------6---------7---------} Paul Kraus -> Senior Systems Architect, Garnet River ( http://www.garnetriver.com/ ) -> Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company ( http://www.sloctheater.org/ ) -> Technical Advisor, RPI Players _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss