On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Matt Harrison
<iwasinnamuk...@genestate.com> wrote:
> On 01/06/2011 20:52, Eric Sproul wrote:
>> What files would those be? Usually the pool name (and therefore the
>> dataset names) doesn't matter-- only mountpoints matter to most things
>> on the system, but maybe you have a more interesting use case. :)
>>
>> Eric
>
> Nothing that impressive :D I have quite a few scripts and config files that
> of course access the data via the mountpoint, which in my case refers to the
> pool name. It's just slightly possible I exaggerated the number of files,
> but still I'd prefer not to do it at all. :)
> But Cindy has just chimed in and confirmed that I can indeed just import the
> pool under the old name.
I think Eric's point was that the zpool/zfs name and the mountpoint do
NOT have to be the same.
See the zfs "mountpoint" property (zfs get mountpoint <zfs> and zfs
set mountpoint=<foo> <zfs>).
--
{--------1---------2---------3---------4---------5---------6---------7---------}
Paul Kraus
-> Senior Systems Architect, Garnet River ( http://www.garnetriver.com/ )
-> Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company (
http://www.sloctheater.org/ )
-> Technical Advisor, RPI Players
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
