> From: Bob Friesenhahn [mailto:bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us] > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 9:58 AM > > > You know what? A year ago I would have said dedup still wasn't stable > > enough for production. Now I would say it's plenty stable enough... But it > > needs performance enhancement before it's truly useful for most cases. > > What has changed for you to change your mind? Did the zfs code change > in the past year, or is this based on experience with the same old > stagnant code?
No idea. I assume they've been patching, and I don't hear many people complaining of dedup instability on this list anymore. But the other option is that nothing's changed, and only my perception has changed. I acknowledge that's possible. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
