On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Eric Bowman <ebow...@boboco.ie> wrote:
> > Anybody have any experience popping this up a bit bigger? What kind of > bad things happen? > I don't have personal experience of upping this restriction. However, my understanding is that if data sizes get large, writing them to network and disk quickly becomes the bottleneck. Since ZK (presumably) has to guarantee that writes hit the disk on at least a quorum of followers, the time taken to process lots of large writes is going to be bounded from below by the time it takes at least one node to write them all serially. This then affects ZK's performance. Henry > > Thanks, > Eric > > -- > Eric Bowman > Boboco Ltd > ebow...@boboco.ie > http://www.boboco.ie/ebowman/pubkey.pgp > +35318394189/+353872801532<http://www.boboco.ie/ebowman/pubkey.pgp%0A+35318394189/+353872801532> > >
