> Zope3 has never supported PAS and I doubt it ever well. That is a shame - the thread I referred to shows that Jim was working on exactly that - it's a shame that never came to fruition (and indeed, its not clear why that attempt failed - should PAS have been fixed to make that transition possible?)
> Since Zope3 is not a successor to Zope2 but a > completely different thing I do not think this is problematic. That too seems a shame to me. So if I found myself with an investment in Zope2 but was looking to the future, Zope3 will not even *attempt* to provide a smoother path for me than, say, moving to django or another alternative framework? I guess the fact the first 4 letters of "zope2" and "zope3" being the same did imply some sense of continuation in at least *some* things... (or, as usual, I may be missing something that is obvious to those closer to the metal than me as a somewhat external observer) Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
