--On 13. Juli 2008 19:38:01 +0300 Mark Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since Zope3 is not a successor to Zope2 but a completely different thing I do not think this is problematic.That too seems a shame to me. So if I found myself with an investment in Zope2 but was looking to the future, Zope3 will not even *attempt* to provide a smoother path for me than, say, moving to django or another alternative framework?
How about GROK?
I guess the fact the first 4 letters of "zope2" and "zope3" being the same did imply some sense of continuation in at least *some* things...
That's reason why the term "zope 3" should be phased out and replaced with "Zope web components" or something similar. You're not the only one being confused by this.
-aj
pgpSnPc9uOJ95.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
