Matthias, A milestone at this point seems reasonable to me.
Do we have an expected time-between-milestones? For example, are we targetting a once-monthly/bimonthly/etc. milestone, or will milestones only come along when the consensus is they are needed? Thanks, Joey On 8/1/06, Matt Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Matthias, It seems appropriate to me that all of the work you have done for refactoring/renaming is good for a milestone. I am curious though, what are the benefits/implications (if any) of having a milestone release at this point? I do not see a need to couple the plug-ins and main source; so releasing them independently would be okay. Thanks, Matt On 7/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > since the major refactoring and renaming tasks are almost done, I > think it's time to think about releasing a first milestone version. > > Two things just out of my mind: > > 1. The release from plugins and trinidad should be independend. > 2. w/ plugins we can start sooner than trinidad itself, b/c trinidad > consumes the artifacts, provided from plugins. > > What are you general feelings about a release at this time? > > I think we are good in the game, because since the middle of May (the > initial commt), there was a lot's of development ongoing. The > community is also growing; thanks to all how participating. > > What about the release number? > > From another incubator "release request" I learned that something like > "0.1.0-incubator" is fine. Currently we have something like > "incubator-alpha-8" (just to give a sample). Maybe we should add a > number to the "-incubator" string? > > Btw. I added the "Plugins" category to our Jira instance, to keep > better track off all plugin related issues. Currently there is only > one listed (see [1]). > > Thanks, > Matthias > > > [1] http://tinyurl.com/ed33c > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >
