+1

On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 3:37 AM Nicholas Sorrell <n...@cint.io> wrote:

> +1. The community and product growth over the past year have been
> impressive and I am excited to see the future growth.
>
> --
> Nick Sorrell
> 513.288.1084
> https://cint.io
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, December 5, 2021 5:02 PM
> To: dev@age.apache.org <dev@age.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Apache AGE (Incubating) - Community Graduation Vote
>
> That looks good to me. +1
>
> To note, 0.6 is not on “Download” on https://age.apache.org/<
> https://age.apache.org/#>
>
> ________________________________
> From: John Gemignani <jgemign...@apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 5:55:40 PM
> To: dev@age.apache.org <dev@age.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Apache AGE (Incubating) - Community Graduation Vote
>
> I completely agree with all of Eya and Josh's points.
>
> Especially, now that we have v0.6.0 out (which took a lot of extra
> attention and cleaned up a lot of pending issues) and with the upcoming
> release of v0.7.0. The latter release will add a significant amount of new
> functionality. This makes me confident that the project will be able to
> move forward a lot more smoothly.
>
> +1
>
> John
>
> On 2021/12/02 01:39:41 Josh Innis wrote:
> > This project has seen incredible growth from when it was originally
> donated to Apache. The community continues to grow as more people see the
> opportunities in what the project could be. Now that we are nearly done
> with our original goal of implementing the openCypher specification in
> Postgres as an extension, we can now begin to pursue some of these powerful
> features that the community is requesting in the Github repository. The
> team is continuing to grow at an accelerated pace, with most of the new
> committers being accepted in the last six months. I personally think the
> future of AGE is bright, especially with all the new features that will be
> coming out in v0.7.0.
> >
> > On 2021/12/01 02:42:22 Eya Badal wrote:
> > > Thank you mentors for your valuable feedback. The feedback is
> addressed below.
> > >
> > > Regarding GitHub issues and pull requests:
> > >   It is true that in the earlier months we were sluggish in responding
> to and closing out issues. In
> > >   April we created SLA to categorise (label), assign, and respond to
> issues. Since April, 95% are
> > >   responded within 72 hours (80% of issues are responded to within 24
> hrs). In the last month we
> > >   have closed 8 issues across the project. Regarding pull requests we
> are behind our internal
> > >   SLA but have addressed that in the last 48 hrs.
> > >
> > > Regarding committer and contributor diversity:
> > >   The committers and contributors act on their own initiative without
> representing a corporation
> > >   or organization. Core contributors are indeed employees of a single
> company (Bitnine Global,
> > >   the project donator) who has interest in the success of AGE but
> there are many entirely
> > >   independent contributors and committers. Contributions span more
> than 20 countries across
> > >   the globe including Australia, Belarus, Belgium, China, France,
> Germany, Ireland, Israel, Italy,
> > >   Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Nigeria, The Philippines, Russia, South
> Korea, Thailand, UK,
> > >   Ukraine, USA and Vietnam.
> > >
> > > Regarding the breakdown of the PPMC membership on affiliation
> (companies) and PPMC growth:
> > >
> > >  The PPMC representation, excluding mentors is as follows:
> > >
> > >   Bitnine Global: Eya Badal, Josh Innis, John Gemignani, Dehowe
> Feng(in voting process).
> > >   Liberation Data: Jasper Blues
> > >   Immuta: Mason Sharp
> > >
> > >  The project has added five new committers taking the total to 10
> (excluding mentors).
> > >
> > >   Bitnine Global: Dehowe Feng
> > >   Kroger: Nick Sorrell
> > >   Ghent University: Pieterjan De Potter
> > >   Agedb: Andrew Ko, Alex Kwak
> > >
> > > RE CS10 “The project maintains a public list of its contributors who
> have decision power”:
> > > We now have the list of community members (committer and PPMC) at
> age.apache.org
> > >
> > > Regarding how incubator-age-viewer is released:
> > >   Age-viewer has been released 8 times. The age-viewer developers are
> looking to release in the
> > >   Apache way soon. The age team is coaching the age-viewer developers
> to encourage future
> > >   releases to comply with Apache guiding principles.
> > >
> > > The documentation link at incubator.apache.org/projects/age.html is
> corrected.
> > >
> > > Regarding project name search and approval:
> > >   We have completed name search and approval. PPMC is actively
> checking Apache AGE brand
> > >   use.
> > >
> > > The licensing issue regarding 0.6.0 has been resolved. We’re happy to
> announce Apache AGE 0.6.0 is officially out today.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your feedback and recognition that after 6 releases
> including 4 Apache releases, we have demonstrated that this community is
> able to run independently outside incubation.
> > >
> > > We look forward to a positive vote on graduation to a Top Level
> Project.
> > >
> > > Thank you
> > > Eya
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2021/11/09 04:31:33 Eya Badal wrote:
> > > > Hi AGE community and Mentors,
> > > >
> > > > Since entering incubation 18 months ago in April 2020 and with five
> > > > versions of AGE released, and 0.6.0 imminent, it's fair to say the
> AGE
> > > > community has demonstrated its ability to build software releases the
> > > > Apache Way.
> > > >
> > > > We have prepared an assessment of the Apache AGE podling’s maturity,
> meant
> > > > to help inform the decision (of the mentors, community, Incubator
> PMC, and
> > > > ASF Board of Directors) to graduate it as a top-level Apache
> project. We
> > > > used the ASF project maturity model
> > > > <
> https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html
> >
> > > > to evaluate the Apache AGE project and assess itself as having no
> major
> > > > areas for concern. The assessment can be found at the Apache AGE
> website
> > > > <https://age.apache.org/#> under the COMMUNITY menu.
> > > >
> > > > In addition to building and releasing software, the community has
> grown the
> > > > Apache AGE project in other areas.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >    -
> > > >
> > > >    There have been 64 unique contributors across the AGE and the
> subproject
> > > >    AGE Viewer. These Contributors have raised >170 issues or pull
> requests.
> > > >    -
> > > >
> > > >    We have been addressing Github issues since the start but
> timeliness was
> > > >    an issue. In April we created our internal SLA to categorise
> (label),
> > > >    assign, and respond to issue and pull requests. Since April, 95%
> are
> > > >    responded within 72 hours (80% of issues are responded to within
> 24 hrs).
> > > >    -
> > > >
> > > >    Contributions span more than 20 countries across the globe -
> Belarus,
> > > >    Belgium, China, France, Germany, Ireland, Israel, Italy,
> Luxembourg,
> > > >    Netherlands, Russia, South Korea, Thailand, UK, Ukraine, USA, and
> Vietnam.
> > > >    -
> > > >
> > > >    We have amassed positive comments throughout and gathered >470
> stars.
> > > >    -
> > > >
> > > >    We have committers from 4 different companies.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > AGE mentors, what is your opinion on this?
> > > >
> > > > Do you agree that we are ready to graduate?
> > > >
> > > > Are there any remaining issues that we can improve on?
> > > >
> > > > If we can capture your issues of concern we can then work those
> issues to
> > > > resolution.
> > > >
> > > > Your feedback would be very much appreciated!
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Eya
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to